Sarah Blahovec Advocate for individuals with disabilities
By Marissa Lang
Updated 9:30 pm, Monday, April 4, 2016
If you've happened to catch the new Batman v. Superman flick, you might have noticed a futuristic looking power wheelchair featured in a few scenes. That chair just so happens to be Silicon Valley's own WHILL chair! While having your product featured alongside Ben Affleck and Henry Cavill is pretty cool, WHILL has some even more exciting news: Their new Model M has just received FDA clearance!
Head over to their website to read the press release on the FDA ruling and to see more about their exciting chairs!
Daily Journal Article: Program aims to break cycle of poverty: HIP Housing graduates 29 from Self-Sufficiency Program
March 24, 2016, 05:00 AM By Bill Silverfarb Daily Journal
Ana Beatriz Cholo Capital & Main
February 24, 2016—Berkeley, CA—A lawsuit filed today in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleges that Serra Yellow Cab (“Serra”) violates federal and state law by charging wheelchair users up to four times more than the standard fare because they require accessible taxis. Serra, a for-profit transportation company based in Daly City, California, is the only taxi company to offer wheelchair accessible taxis for retail taxi service in San Mateo County. Serra has been on notice since 2013 that this discriminatory policy and practice is illegal, but it continues to this day.
Accessible taxis provide either a lift or ramp into the vehicle. Passengers in power chairs (or wheelchairs that cannot fit into the vehicle trunk) and/or passengers who are unable to transfer from their wheelchair to the vehicle seat require accessible taxis in order to use taxi service.
The suit is brought by the Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (“CID”) and Joseph Del Aguila. Plaintiff CID is the independent living center for San Mateo County, with a mission to advance the independence of individuals with disabilities. As a part of its mission, CID advocates for those persons with disabilities who require accessible taxis. In fact, CID notified Serra in 2013 that charging wheelchair users a higher fare for taxi service is unlawful. Mr. Del Aguila uses a wheelchair because of a mobility disability and needs a lift or a ramp to board a taxi. On one occasion, Mr. Del Aguila was charged $35.00 for a trip of 1.5 miles which took less than 10 minutes. Plaintiffs are represented by Disability Rights Advocates, a national non-profit organization specializing in litigation on behalf of people with disabilities.
“Serra’s discriminatory practice robs persons with disabilities of their independence,” said David DeNola, Executive Director of CID. “Persons who need accessible taxi service are forced to pay ridiculously high fares for taxi service, rely on others to assist them in traveling throughout the area, or simply not participate in the activities of their daily lives. No one, disabled or not, should have to make this choice.”
According to Vincent Merola, Systems Change Coordinator at CID, “This is not the first time Serra Cab has been notified about their unlawful practices. It’s unconscionable that they would continue to prey off of those in our community who are often times the most vulnerable.”
Joseph Del Aguila, said, “I would like the option of using taxis to get to meetings, medical appointments, and cultural activities, but the cost of Serra’s accessible taxi service is prohibitive. Because Serra is the only choice for people like me who require accessible taxis, I’m forced to find less efficient alternatives to taxi service. I don’t think it’s right that I’m in this dilemma just because I have a mobility disability.”
“People with mobility disabilities need affordable transportation to get to work, health care, and places like restaurants, movie theaters, and parks. Accessible taxis are often more reliable and flexible than paratransit, a good alternative to owning one’s own vehicle, and a replacement for public transportation that has its own access issues,” said Mary-Lee Smith, Director of Litigation at Disability Rights Advocates. “Serra’s practice of charging people with mobility disabilities an exorbitant fare obstructs full and equal community integration and participation for these individuals.”
A copy of the Complaint is available at www.dralegal.org.
About Disability Rights Advocates (DRA):
With offices in New York and California, Disability Rights Advocates (DRA) is one of the leading non-profit disability rights legal centers in the nation. DRA’s mission is to advance equal rights and opportunities for people with all types of disabilities nationwide. As a part of that mission, DRA recently entered into a landmark settlement that dramatically improves access to taxis in New York City for people with mobility disabilities, increasing the number of accessible taxis from 2% of the fleet to 50% of the fleet. www.dralegal.org
Mary-Lee Smith, Disability Rights Advocates, (510) 665-8644
Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (CID) v. Serra Yellow Cab
Daily Journal Article: Suit alleges Serra Yellow Cab inequity: Disabled man says company illegally charged him more
NBC11 Coverage of Suit
ABC7 Coverage of Suit
Sometimes, we take accessible buildings for granted; but they aren’t always accessible for people living with disabilities and our rights aren’t always granted.
Every now and then we have to make some noise, show up and be counted, prepare for a smack down…
So it was at the California Building Standards Commission last week. Couldn’t make it to Sacramento? Didn’t really understand the issues? Wondering what happened?
We’ve condensed two days of testimony and cliff hanger votes into 30 jam-packed minutes with 12 of the advocates who made the trip and stood up for your access rights. They are Ana Acton, Barry Atwood, Vanessa Proe, Nicole Sykes, Connie Arnold, Tim Thimesch, Dawn Anderson, HolLynn D’Lil, Russell Rollings, Kristen Ansel, and Dolores Tejada.
Produced and Edited by Sheela Gunn-Cushman with production help from Adrienne Lauby and Shelley Berman.
For more details and to follow this issue:
Jan 19: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qvsIfkWdvo
Jan. 20: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6Z26-9QJxw
Disability Organizing Network https://disabilityorganizing.net
HolLynn D’Lil: firstname.lastname@example.org
Lego unveils first ever minifigure in wheelchair
New Legal Details Emerge on City Sidewalk Repair Settlement
That Time The United States Sterilized 60,000 Of Its Citizens
At the time, however, sterilization both was countenanced by the U.S. Supreme Court (in the 1927 Buck v. Bell case) and supported by many scientists, reformers, and lawmakers as one prong of a larger strategy to improve society by encouraging the reproduction of the “fit” and restricting the procreation of the “unfit.” In total, 32 U.S. states passed sterilization laws between 1907 and 1937, and surgeries reached their highest numbers in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Beginning in the 1970s, state legislatures began to repeal these laws, finding them antiquated and discriminatory, particularly towards people with disabilities.
Keeping you updated on all things CID and disability.
Please feel free to comment on any post. Our goal is to be interactive!